Hi!
Not sure I understand this correctly: Would you see immediately from your data processing if a given ephemeris would be correct (e.g. because your tomography suddenly gives a consistent "picture" which would not likely happen from just "luck")? If so, would there be a way to "just" use massive computing power to guess the right period? (Thinking computing clusters or even volunteer distributed computing...). Just curious (as this is basically what I do for a living :-) : looking for pulsars in radio, gamma and gravitational wave data to detect objects by "guessing the right parameters" and then testing the hypotheses against the data).
Cheers
HB
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Heinz-Bernd Eggenstein, Scientific Software Engineer
Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics
Callinstrasse 38
D-30167 Hannover, Germany
Tel.: +49-511-762-17153 (Room 036)
-----"cba-chat" <cba-chat-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: -----
To: cba-chat@xxxxxxxxxxx
From: David Buckley
Sent by: "cba-chat"
Date: 10/09/2018 11:00PM
Subject: Re: (cba:chat) (cba:news) Maxie update
Hi Joe,
We've been observing it here in SA of and on since May with both 1-m and
10-m (SALT), mostly ~200 msec to look for QPOs (seen earlier in the
o/b). We've also gotten a fair bit of spectroscopy (1.9-m + SALT) and
have been playing around with trailed spectra and Doppler tomography (of
HeII and H-beta). Some results seem to indicate that there might be a
stream, but its position is not right, so not sure what the correct T_0
to use is for this. If its not strictly orbital, then this is a problem,
of course, for tomography. So apart from the strong presumed SH
period, has anything else popped out in terms of periods which we might
use to phase the velocities?
Cheers,
David.
On 2018/10/09 10:39 PM, Joe Patterson wrote:
Hi CBAers,
As many of you know, Maxie has been plummeting in brightness at around
0.08 mag/day in recent days. It almost got to V=15.0 a few days ago,
but now seems to have rebounded by ~0.7 mag - quite a big jump if it's
actually true.
In addition, the 0.7 d periodic signal continues. No proof that it's
the residue of the once-proud superhump, but that's a good possibility.
Twilight has greatly shortened the runs, but it's still (barely)
possible to see that periodic signal. So the star is good for another
week - V filter only, and no need for good time resolution. After
that, snapshot V magnitudes will be fine.
joe p
____________________________________________________________
Center for Backyard Astrophysics (CBA) mailing lists
https://cbastro.org/communications/mailing-lists/
!DSPAM:5bbd11f117931199498168!
____________________________________________________________
Center for Backyard Astrophysics (CBA) mailing lists
https://cbastro.org/communications/mailing-lists/
____________________________________________________________
Center for Backyard Astrophysics (CBA) mailing lists
https://cbastro.org/communications/mailing-lists/