Dear CBAers, Some homework on these two stars!UX UMa. I've drafted up a paper, minus the interpretation stuff, and with figures unlabelled and fragmentary (both attached), but I need some help from you.
1. Author list. Can you check table 1 and supply, if you know it, how many nights/hours you contributed to this campaign. Also, if possible and if consistent with some approximation to uniformity, tell me how you'd like your observatory/telescope described. For actual authorship, I've usually used the criterion "at least 5% of the data", but since there are so many contributors, I might include everyone here. For completeness you might also send your postal address, and if you like you can use your observatory name there, if you have one.
2. I was surprised, almost shocked, by the large-amplitude 3.7 day signal. UX UMa has been very thoroughly studied for 60 years by some people (Walker, Krzeminski, Smak, etc.) who don't miss much. They never had data like this, but I don't think they could have missed an effect this big. Is the star unusually bright or faint this year? It would be nice if we knew! Retroactively is fine. If you have observed the star in this year's campaign, take some data exactly as you did and, more or less simultaneously, take some time series with calibrated V.
3. And if you're so inclined, take another two weeks of time series, just to track this large-amplitude signal.
IGR J1955+00. If you've observed this star, you know it's not like any other star we've ever discussed. The 81 minute orbital (?) variations are huge, and the fast variations are huge and crazily fast. We don't have the aperture and time resolution to explore the latter point... but the most likely interpretation at this point is that it's a radial accretor (AM Her star) and we're seeing cyclotron radiation from the accretion funnel. That would imply an extremely red color for the variation - much redder than any (plausible) thermal process could manufacture. We really need *simultaneous* time series in two colors - V and I would be an OK choice, and R and I would also be a good pair. The more strictly simultaneous, the better. Maybe you can use cba-chat to accomplish this: A does V, B does I, and we can thereby synthesize V-I.
Remarks on other stars tomorrow. joe (a)
Attachment:
uxpap715.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
Attachment:
uxfigs.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
____________________________________________________________ Center for Backyard Astrophysics (CBA) mailing lists https://cbastro.org/communications/mailing-lists/