[Date Prev][Date Next][Date Index]

(cba:news) V339 Del and UX UMa (Joe Patterson) [2015-07-09T02:40:23Z]


Yeah, V339 Del appears to be a loser. Nice performance at other wavelengths, but pretty flat in the optical. Time to quit at optical wavelengths.

And for that matter, time to quit on UX UMa (even for the diehards). The periodic signals continue to amaze, but the runs are getting too short, and it's time to move on.

IGR 1955+00 remains awfully interesting! And some time series on V404 Cygni would be mighty nice too.

joe


On 7/8/2015 10:31 PM, Jim Jones wrote:
Enrique

Then I won't bother making a run to link up with Davids.

Jim

On 7/8/2015 5:28 PM, Enrique de Miguel wrote:
Jim,

  David is using V filter.
With the current data, no modulation comes up in the light curve.

Enrique

On Jul 9, 2015, at 2:00 AM, Jim Jones wrote:

What filter David?

Jim Jones

On 7/8/2015 4:21 PM, David Cejudo wrote:
I am actually following V338 Del as Enrique asked me to.
I may change targeta if neded, though.

David Cejudo.




El 8/7/2015, a las 16:08, Joe Patterson <jop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
escribió:

Hi Donn et al.,

Thanx for the details.  Yes, I think it is a "super-period" around
12 hours or so... but the precise value will depend on filter
issues (since the AM Her stars often show really bright I emission
due to cyclotron emission).  The basic period seems to be 81
minutes, a very plausible Porb - but the star is pretty remarkable
for its super-period, and for its huge variations on a timescale of
just a few seconds (or maybe even less than 1 sec!).

As Enrique says, we'll be able to splice these light curves
together better when the star transits closer to local midnight.
Shawn
(easternmost USA observer) and Josch/Arto (Chile observers) will be
in a good position to splice with Spanish observers (Enrique,
David, Tomas).  And Gordon (AU) may be able to splice with Berto (ZA).

joe

On 7/8/2015 9:41 AM, Donn Starkey wrote:
Joe, et.al.:

My runs on IGR J19552+0044 were performed using a clear filter.  The
comp star was AAVSO 145 and the K star was AAVSO 148.  I used the R
magnitude for these two stars:

C star    AAVSO 145     R mag 14.258
K star    AAVSO 148     R mag 14.292

Exposure times were at 120 sec for each night of observation.

Because of the placement of this star [or maybe because of my
placement
in relationship to the star] I started observing a very high air
masses.  Originally, I had thought that the star was brightening
during
the run due to lowering air masses, but subsequent runs shows that
the data did not appear to be effected by the air mass.  Is this a
long
term period fluctuation on the order of a multiple of ~12 hours?

I am out of town until the 17th, but will continue observations on
this
target when I return home....unless directed otherwise.

Donn


----------------------------------------
Donn Starkey
donn@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:donn@xxxxxxxxxx>



------------------------------------------------------------------------

    *From:* Joe Patterson <jop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    *To:* Gordon Myers <gordonmyers@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Enrique de Miguel
    <edmiguel63@xxxxxxxxx>; donn@xxxxxxxxxx
    *Sent:* Monday, July 6, 2015 11:06 PM
    *Subject:* IGR J19552+0044

    Hi guys,

    Helluva entertaining star this is!  The 81 minute period is very
    obvious, of course, and so are the super-fast (<5 s actually)
    oscillations in the "high state".  But I'm having trouble
putting these
    time-series on a common scale.  Because of the star's equatorial
    location, it's hard to get overlap - and we don't have any strict
    overlap.  In addition, there's some reason to believe that the
    brightness of the star is very different in V versus R versus
I. (Not
    known, but very possible.)

    So can you state in detail how you derived your magnitudes
(even if you
    did in your original submission), and then copy all of us on
it?  I
    sure
    would like to figure out that longish period or quasi-period
that seems
    to be present (around a day?).

    As you know, most CVs look pretty much the same at any
wavelengths near
    BVRI (their colors are usually close to B=V=R=I=0).  But the
magnetics
    (AM Hers) are often much brighter in I, because of cyclotron
radiation.
       You could perhaps check this by taking some data in I.

    joe
____________________________________________________________
Center for Backyard Astrophysics (CBA) mailing lists
https://cbastro.org/communications/mailing-lists/
____________________________________________________________
Center for Backyard Astrophysics (CBA) mailing lists
https://cbastro.org/communications/mailing-lists/
____________________________________________________________
Center for Backyard Astrophysics (CBA) mailing lists
https://cbastro.org/communications/mailing-lists/
____________________________________________________________
Center for Backyard Astrophysics (CBA) mailing lists
https://cbastro.org/communications/mailing-lists/


____________________________________________________________
Center for Backyard Astrophysics (CBA) mailing lists
https://cbastro.org/communications/mailing-lists/

____________________________________________________________
Center for Backyard Astrophysics (CBA) mailing lists
https://cbastro.org/communications/mailing-lists/