(cba:news) AM CVn... one last push
Joe Patterson
jop at astro.columbia.edu
Fri May 7 06:30:46 EDT 2021
Hi CBAers,
Apologies for the (proverbial) radio silence. I recently returned to
regular classroom teaching after a year's break... and what seemed so
natural in 2019 now seems Herculean. Half the students scattered around
the world, half live (seated in a vast room with 90% of seats blocked),
cameras reducing me to insect-size, and practically no opportunity for
feedback. Masks, distancing, computers monitoring all buildings - and
we thought PC was bad! It's even more grim for students... but on the
bright side, we effusively thank each other for helping us with our
slow, uncertain emergence from isolation.
I'm sure that many of you have similar stories - which I'd be interested
in hearing.
The last (at least for now) piece of the AM CVn puzzle is the two
drifting superhumps. Do they drift in phase, in anti-phase, or
uncorrelated? Physics seems to demand "anti-phase". But this year -
our best, and therefore anyone's best - suggests"in phase". The drift
is SLOW, so you really need a full oberving season (~5 months) to get
the answer. We're close... but restoring AM CVn to high-importance (=>
LONG nightly runs) would much more accurately define the signal phases
in this last month of observation, before short summer nights stop us.
I really, really want to nail this down!
Weekend respite coming up... and I'll comment on the wider list of good
targets. Mostly old novae, supplementing ENrique's mostly-IP list.)
joe
____________________________________________________________
Center for Backyard Astrophysics (CBA) mailing lists
https://cbastro.org/communications/mailing-lists/
More information about the cba-public
mailing list