From jop at astro.columbia.edu Thu Apr 18 15:53:00 2013 From: jop at astro.columbia.edu (Joe Patterson) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 15:53:00 -0400 Subject: (cba:news) xmm1151-62, mainly Message-ID: <51704F1C.4090909@astro.columbia.edu> Dear (mainly southern) CBAers, In 2010 we thought we had this guy figured out. The star reached 10th mag in 2008, and was a pretty strong (super?)soft X-ray source in 2010, when it had declined to mag 13.8. It was referred to as "Nova Cen 2008"... and we didn't have any major gripe about that, although we preferred a "V Sagittae" model, based on the (likely) Porb and spectrum. Here are some useful links and a finding chart: http://www.astro.columbia.edu/~jules/XMMUJ115113.3-623730/ Josch and Berto have been observing this star pretty often in the last month. It's now down to about 15.4... and shows some waves in the light curve, but with no obvious period. I'm pretty surprised by this! It doesn't agree with other stars in this class, and I'm reluctant to let go of the idea that our 8.6 hr period in 2010 was Porb, or at least some important, persistent signal in it. That would force us to re-think some of our ideas about V Sge - and I'm really fond of those ideas! So I hope that you australites out there will observe this star long and often in the next few weeks. The best comparison star is the AAVSO star AUID 000-BJV-892, with a nominal magnitude of 11.3... and if that is unsuitable, then AUID 000-BJV-893, with a nominal magnitude of 11.5. As usual, unfiltered is fine, but V is better, mainly because it minimizes differential extinction. An HST observation of QZ Lib = ASAS1536-08 is coming up... and, for all the usual reasons, observations of it are now critical. However, unlike the other stars on Boris's program, this one can really use time series. At 18th mag, that will be difficult - but if you have decent aperture and observing conditions, give it a try! Finally, at the other end of the brightness axis, we still could use observations of EX Hya for another 1-2 weeks. joe