From jop at astro.columbia.edu Fri Apr 2 11:12:06 2010 From: jop at astro.columbia.edu (Joe Patterson) Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2010 10:12:06 -0500 Subject: (cba:news) New from AIP4Win... and some stars too Message-ID: <4BB60946.9030504@astro.columbia.edu> Dear CBAers, I think about half of you are using Richard Berry's AIP4Win software. It's probably the quickest way to go from unwrapping the camera to scientifically useful data... so some of you might want to look at it. It comes with their fine book "Astronomical Image Processing"... and I'm sure is available free-standing too. Anyway, he has a "CBA data format" option in the software, which makes ol' spreadsheet-phobic me happy - and now includes airmass as well, which will make it possible to remove differential extinction to first order. That will give us access to an awkward period regime - from 0.3 to 2.0 days. Here's his message. BTW some of you might want to attend the NEAIC/NEAF meeting in 2 weeks. I'll be there Sunday, though not Saturday. The talks are OK but nothing great... but the vendor booths, now they're just wonderful! Better than Riverside, Stellafane, ASP, SAS, or anything I've ever seen. It's like the astronomer's version of the Las Vegas consumer electronics show, ot the Tucson gem show. All your coverage of MU Cam and BG CMi have cinched the cycle count; these stars can be retired for the season. The only remaining guy on that particular menu is WX Pyx, which can use 2-3 more runs. Then I'd like to commend some HARD (faint) targets: OT 1112-35 (11 12 17.4 -35 38 28.8 2000.0) SDSS 1238-03 ("Vir" in Downes cat) SDSS 0813+28 SDSS 0804+51 SDSS 0751+14 These are high-risk (cuz they're faint), high-reward stars. Some may be around 19th mag or even 20. If the time overhead for acquiring a snapshot magnitude is not too much, snapshot magnitudes are plenty valuable. And if you don't feel too strange in acquiring a time series on a star you can barely detect, that would be great too. More on the brighter stars later today. AM CVn remains a very, very good target - and of happy day, transiting near local midnight. In the south, it's time to start up again on EX Hya (easy target), and to get acquainted with LY Hya (hard target), joe -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: AIP4WIN's CBA Report format... Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 19:59:39 -0700 From: Richard Berry To: Joe Patterson CC: Tom Krajci , Russ Garrett Hi Joe /et al./-- The most recent AIP4Win (beta) includes the airmass and additional material in the header. The next release (i.e., the working draft I have on my computer) has coordinates for V, C1, and C2 in the header. I'll be speaking at NEAIC/NEAF two weeks from now. The NEAIC theme this year -- by popular demand -- is "doing science with CCD cameras." Even though most people are still doing pretty pictures, there's a growing number who want to do something more substantial. --Richard Joe Patterson wrote: > Hi Richard et al., > > Yes, that's great. Tom's comment says it all: the airmass is > definitely useful - occasionally for the science, and *always* as a > monitor for when the observer's pushing things too far, falls asleep, > etc. A little header information is good too - comp star coordinates, > maybe USNO number, nominal V, etc. > > Richard, thanks so much for doing this! It'll really streamline the > path for new observers. > > Russ, sorry for my sluggishness. A stream of visits from > in-laws/relatives. One of the several penalties for living in NYC. > I've exhausted my annual quota of museums and restaurants. Just 1.5 > more days, hallelujah. > > joe > > > Tom Krajci wrote: >> Hi Richard, >> >> I like having the air mass option for CBA reports. For some projects >> Joe needs better data calibration to tease out faint periodic >> signals, especially in the frequency regime of 2 - 5 cycles/day. Air >> mass info helps improve the calibration. (I'm also looking forward >> to seeing air mass info with Russ' photometry because he's using a >> blue-block filter that helps reduce the effect of differential >> extinction that can be a real problem in long time-series work. This >> may be a useful 'middle ground' between unfiltered and a typical >> photometric bandpass of about 300nm.) >> >> Anyway, it's easier to delete air mass info if you include it...than >> try and add it later. >> >> One final thought - would it be possible to include in the >> output/header some info on the comp stars?..mostly the name/coords. >> That can help when combining data sets from different >> observers...it's just good record keeping. >> >> Tom From jop at astro.columbia.edu Fri Apr 2 19:27:36 2010 From: jop at astro.columbia.edu (Joe Patterson) Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2010 19:27:36 -0400 Subject: (cba:news) SDSS J105550.08+095620.4] Message-ID: <4BB67D68.3000507@astro.columbia.edu> This looks like a pretty good one. Not if it's a normal outburst (no humps) - but most of these detections turn out to be supers. joe -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [cvnet-outburst] SDSS J105550.08+095620.4 Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 21:21:59 +0000 From: Jeremy Shears Reply-To: cvnet-outburst at yahoogroups.com To: , SDSS J105550.08+095620.4 Apr 2.877 15.4C SDSS has g=19.2; CRTS range 14.1 - 18.9 CV (CRTS: A.J. Drake et al. 2009, ApJ 696, 870) Timeseries started Jeremy Shears Cheshire, UK __________________________________________________________ Do you have a story that started on Hotmail? Tell us now http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/195013117/direct/01/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] __._,_.___ Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1) Recent Activity: * New Members 1 Visit Your Group Visit us on the web at http://cvnet.aavso.org MARKETPLACE Do More for Dogs Group. Connect with other dog owners who do more. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Welcome to Mom Connection! Share stories, news and more with moms like you. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests. Yahoo! Groups Switch to: Text-Only , Daily Digest ? Unsubscribe ? Terms of Use . __,_._,___ From jop at astro.columbia.edu Sun Apr 4 04:42:41 2010 From: jop at astro.columbia.edu (Joe Patterson) Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2010 04:42:41 -0400 Subject: (cba:news) V1032 Oph, fire away! Message-ID: <4BB85101.5030608@astro.columbia.edu> Dear CBAers, A new eclipsing superhumper in outburst - outstanding! Definitely the object for urgent morning attention this week. Make the time series as long as possible, and follow the object as long as possible down towards quiescence (so white light is fine, as usual). First one of these in a long time! joe -------- Original Message -------- Subject: (cba:data) V1032 Oph (3-4 Apr 2010) (JD 290.638 to 290.731) clearly an eclipsing UGSU Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 08:16:54 +0200 From: Enrique de Miguel Agustino Reply-To: cba-tech at cbastro.org To: cba-data at cbastro.org Hi there, Confirmation of the UGSU+E nature of this target. The eclipse I found on March 31 (data sent to the CBA) did correspond to an orbital eclipse. Tentative orbital period P_orb = 0.0795(3) though more data is clearly needed to refine this value. See comments below. Regards, Enrique, Huelva (Spain) -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: Attached Message Part URL: From jop at astro.columbia.edu Sun Apr 4 04:48:36 2010 From: jop at astro.columbia.edu (Joe Patterson) Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2010 04:48:36 -0400 Subject: (cba:news) Enrique's note re V1032 Oph Message-ID: <4BB85264.9090101@astro.columbia.edu> Dear CBAers, Here's Enrique's note re this new discovery. BTW I think he observes with a FOUR inch telescope - unless he has upgraded (have you, Enrique?) I'm a little late with the notification - let's scramble and make up for my tardiness! Beautiful Easter surprise. joe -------- Original Message -------- Subject: V1032 Oph seems to be an eclipsing UGSU Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 08:43:29 +0200 From: Enrique de Miguel Agustino To: Joe Patterson Dear Joe, Just wanted to call your attention on this target. This is an UGSU type variable that turns out to display orbital eclipses. To the best of my knowledge, the UGSU+E nature of this target had not been previously noticed. I find P_orb=0.0795(3) d (using just about 4h data obtained in two runs). As far as I'm aware, observers contributing to the vsnet database are following this target. Maybe there some CBAers who are interested in keeping an eye on this target. With my observing conditions, I'm constraint to follow this target no more than 2 hours just before sunrise. I'm enclosing a plot of the today's run. Regards, Enrique de Miguel Huelva (Spain) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: V1032-Oph.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 70406 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: Attached Message Part URL: From jop at astro.columbia.edu Mon Apr 5 08:40:05 2010 From: jop at astro.columbia.edu (Joe Patterson) Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 08:40:05 -0400 Subject: (cba:news) AM CVn mostly Message-ID: <4BB9DA25.5010508@astro.columbia.edu> Dear CBAers, Reports from Tut Campbell, George Roberts, and Jeremy Shears indicate that SDSS 1055+09 faded fast... which usually means a normal outburst. There's some chance it'll trigger a super, so 2-3 more days of snapshots would be good. Unless it jumps back into a super within 3 days, forget about it. Thanks in part to a long season-opening baseball game, I've finished analyzing the month's data on AM CVn. The perpetrators were Bob Koff, Tut Campbell/George Roberts, Russ Garrett, Arto Oksanen, Bart Staels, and Gordon Myers. A great team, and a great month of data! As some of you know, we don't particularly track the main superhump (at 525.6 sec) nowadays. It's always present with the same amplitude, and its phase wanders on a timescale of weeks - as we've shown in many papers stretching over 30 years (although for 22 of them, this was considered "controversial"). Now my main interest is tracking the orbital wave, which is significantly weaker and therefore requires many long time series to specify with the needed precision. That wave occurs at 1028.7322 s. It's particularly interesting because AM CVn is a likely target for the upcoming gravitational-wave detectors (2 WDs orbiting in 17.5 minutes, that's a pretty potent radiator of GR). And also because when we see the Porb *change*, it signifies the direction and rate of binary evolution - which we'd dearly like to know for these ancient binaries! I have 3 good orbital timings for the month, which is normally a good haul for a whole observing season. However, I noticed that the NODAL SUPERHUMP - the 1011 second signal which probably comes from the retrograde wobble of the disk - was strong throughout March. I've never seen it so consistently strong. We've *never* done (nor has anyone else of course) a thorough study of that signal - for stability, harmonics, and correlations with the wandering of the 525 s signal. Since we've already got a good baseline and the observing season has plenty of life left in it, let's KEEP THE CAMPAIGN GOING. It's particularly a good choice for smaller scopes (not suitable for the deep-sea targets) or for mediocre nights (since our interest is *periodic signals*, mere loss of signal-to-noise is not that important). But of course, best of all are long time series on excellent nights with large telescopes! This doesn't cancel or modify my earlier target suggestions. But they did run a touch on the *faint* side... and I was delighted to see such interesting and new things come once again from our old friend AM CVn! joe From jop at astro.columbia.edu Fri Apr 9 08:02:44 2010 From: jop at astro.columbia.edu (Joe Patterson) Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 08:02:44 -0400 Subject: (cba:news) the dwarf novae strike back... Message-ID: <4BBF1764.1040807@astro.columbia.edu> Dear CBAers, After a sluggish few months, the dwarf novae are rising up to take command (for a while) of cataclysmic-variable glamor in the night sky. Three unstudied and quite interesting dwarf novae have jumped into superoutburat: SDSS0839+28, V1032 Oph, and V591 Cen. Great pickings!... and the dwarf novae, unlike many of the CVs we study, pretty much demand attention on their schedule, not on ours. These stars are all new, and at least two are very distinctive (eclipsing, and a good WZ Sge candidate). Whichever suits your horizon/latitude/weather... is likely to be a great winner! joe Thanks to Enrique de Miguel Agustino for the energy, and uncanny nose, to find these new guys! From jop at astro.columbia.edu Fri Apr 9 08:07:34 2010 From: jop at astro.columbia.edu (Joe Patterson) Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 08:07:34 -0400 Subject: (cba:news) oops Message-ID: <4BBF1886.6090502@astro.columbia.edu> Sorry... for those wishing more formality, that's SDSS J083931.35+282824.0 Big waves in the light curve, hurrah. joe From jop at astro.columbia.edu Fri Apr 9 08:42:31 2010 From: jop at astro.columbia.edu (Joe Patterson) Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 08:42:31 -0400 Subject: (cba:news) and yet another... Message-ID: <4BBF20B7.7040805@astro.columbia.edu> Patrick Woudt writes about another, a new Catalina Sky Survey transient in which he found fresh superhumps last night. The object is CSS100408:105215-064326. The code here is year-month-date:RA+dec. So in more common shorthand, it might be called CSS 1052-06 or OT 1052-06. (The nomenclature for these things is kinda fuzzy until the all-wise but famously glacial GCVS people get around to assigning an official name.) The CSS website for transients is a real gold mine. (Finding charts, too.) If you don't already know it, you're in for a treat. This is a good one too - Patrick threatens to study it in quiescence too, which always increases the scientific clout of these supermax light curves. joe