(cba:news) choosing your optical transient...
Joe Patterson
jop at astro.columbia.edu
Sun Jan 27 20:38:00 EST 2008
Dear CBAers,
I've analyzed all the data so far on ot0747, and ot0845. The former
looks to be very well behaved, with a constant period at Psh=0.06073(8)
d. Seems to be under control! I'll send the full lot of data to all
the observers.
OT0845 is another story. This now has strong superhumps, but they
probably *just* emerged, and the star is a bit fainter at 15. So our
data on it is very sparse - not enough to really parse the period(s). So
if you can get comfortably to 15.5 or so, OT0845 is definitely the
better choice.
joe
More information about the cba-public
mailing list