25 December 2011 Dear CBAers, Merry Christmas, everyone! It's a new sidereal season, too. Time to say goodbye to some of our long fall campaigns - esp. BW Scl, V378 Peg, and CD Ind. For those of you who participated in these campaigns, and who might like to take a crack at analyzing the data - ask! Except for a few DQ Hers (for which relatively short runs are still useful), stars in the RA range 19h -> 2h should probably be ushered off the stage. And let's also suspend BY Cam, not for poor performance, poor coverage, or lack of seasonality (it's superb in all those areas)... but just to give some room for other deserving stars! (The BY Cam campaign is already 80 nights long.) Now for two campaigns we *do* want to continue. 1. Josch Hambsch has been carrying out a close but solo vigil on TV Columbae. This star is crucial for the question of "how long a Porb for apsidal superhumps?" and "effect of magnetism on disk stability". It's a candidate for apsidal superhumps (claimed period 6.3 hours). The seasonal timing is excellent for Columba, but summer nights only permit brief runs. That, plus the awkwardness of 6.3 hrs (too long, too easily aliased), makes multi-longitude coverage MANDATORY. So this is a very high priority target for other longitudes (South Africa, AU/NZ)... and continued observation from Chile. 2. "Paloma" (RX0524+42) is a pretty good candidate for an asynchronous polar. Enrique and Tom have been actively observing it... but the campaign definitely needs help - and also length. The star is quite faint (about 17.3), but typically has a very large amplitude (1 mag). Mainly, though, we want to start up several new campaigns. Basically all these are in the "negative superhump" category - either revisiting a star that showed such a signal in a previous campaign, or launching a first-time search for signals. In all cases, quite long nightly time series are very desirable. 1. KUV0358+06 = TAU 2 = SDSS0400+06 = (I think) V1294 Tau. We did one previous campaign on this star, and it revealed signals slightly shorter and longer than Porb (as well as Porb). This is a rarity... but what really surprised me was the epsilon (the percentage displacement of the signals from Porb). It was just half of what's expected, based on Porb. Southern Taurus is well placed again, and I'm hoping for some contributions from AU/NZ - these would eliminate any potential confusion due to aliasing (more worrisome here, since there are *three* closely nested signals). 2. AH MEN. Definitely. Past campaigns are consistent with the same result (positive and negative superhumps), but aliasing is problematic. In theory we should be able to get round-the-world coverage: Chile, NZ, AU, South Africa. That'll clobber those aliases! Note: this is quite a bright star, but has a contaminating neighbor about 3-4 arcsec away. Probably it's best to measure the two stars together (aperture photometry), and for some night of excellent seeing and small image profile, measure the relative contributions. 3. IM ERI (0424-20). Nice bright star, eclipsing, superhumps. Same story - very good target, and to combat differential extinction, V observations are recommended (if you can tolerate the light loss). 4. ER UMA and BK LYN. Enrique has started up these campaigns. Both stars have negative superhumps, and we are trying now to study long-term timing effects of this signal. They're *slightly* out of season, but several-hour time series now, followed by *really* long ones in Jan/Feb, will properly test the stability of these signals. Finally, there's T Pyx. The actual slow decline is being well documented by many people. But we need time series to define Porb as accurately as possible - that means fairly long nightly time series. There's the desiderata. Happy observing! joe