(cba:news) CP Puppis, rest in peace (not)
jop at astro.columbia.edu
Mon Feb 13 09:32:45 EST 2017
Oh... and a big shout-out to the stars of the campaign - Berto, Gordon,
Josch, and Peter Nelson!
On 2/13/2017 9:26 AM, Joe Patterson wrote:
> Hi CBAers,
> I've completed analysis of the CP Pup data for the season. As was
> hinted at but not quite proved 3 years ago, the photometric period
> really is well separated - about 8% - from the spectroscopic (presumed
> orbital) period. Hallelujah. The instability in waveform and period
> shows that it cannot reside in the dynamcal parts of the binary (the
> two stars), but must reside in the disk - the main source of light.
> Your basic superhump. Ever hear of such things?
> Me too. But 8% separation - not 2% as we thought 20 years ago, based on
> a 1-day alias - breaks all, or almost all, the rules. It indicates a
> very strong perturbation on the disk by the secondary. The most
> plausible way to get this is origin at the 2:1 resonance in the disk,
> not 3:1 as is customary for superhumpers. But very few disks are *big*
> enough to reach the 2:1 resonance; only for a very extreme mass ratio
> (probably M2/M1 less than around 0.05) can the disk extend that far.
> This probably indicates a secondary less than around 0.05 Mo.
> Kinda fascinating. There are very few classical novae of short Porb,
> although the great majority of CVs are of short Porb. This has always
> been troubling (to me; some others are strangely unruffled by it). CP
> Pup may guide us to a solution.
> But we're done for the year!
> Center for Backyard Astrophysics (CBA) mailing lists
Center for Backyard Astrophysics (CBA) mailing lists
More information about the cba-public