Re: V455 And

From: Joe Patterson <*jop_at_astro.columbia.edu*> Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 17:40:29 -0400 · jop_at_astro.columbia.edu

Hi Tom,

Oh yes, thanks for asking (about recorded mid-exposure times)!  Most 
people have been listing to 5 or more places.  5 is definitely the right 
number here (i.e. JD xx.yyyyy), although 4 is the right number for most 
of our programs.  You've been sending 4, and your coverage is quite 
good, so I meant to write you earlier and ask for another place.  So I'm 
asking now.

34 s will be a challenge for us, but is worth some effort.  But 68 s 
should be accessible as long as the star is bright.  This star is PACKED 
with periodic signals at quiescence, so longer timescales are plenty 
interesting too of course!

joe