CBA Center for Backyard Astrophysics



News

recent · all
2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003
2002 · 2001 · 2000 · 1999 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996

    rumblings in aquila

    From: Joe Patterson <jop_at_astro.columbia.edu>
    Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 07:32:28 -0400 (EDT)
    Dear CBAers,
    
    Well, the V603 Aql campaign has been going very well, with ~30 nights of
    dense coverage.  Bob Rea, Neil Butterworth, and Berto have been the main
    perpetrators.  The star shows a very strong positive superhump at 0.1449
    days.  No hint of the negative superhump that dominated in 1992, and no
    harmonics either.  Just a clear pure note, in the silence.
    
    So that means we can forget V603 for the rest of the year.  On to other
    targets!
    
    In the north, I'm still earnestly hoping for good coverage of V533 Her
    before it slinks into the western twilight.  It seems to have a decent
    positive superhump (P=7.3% greater than Porb), but the data still don't
    quite clinch the matter.  Another 2 weeks of coverage will, though, and
    will define the period with high precision.
    
    It's time to promote V1494 Aql (the 1999 nova) to a position of greater
    honor.  The 2000-1 data show that this is basically a 3.23 hour eclipsing
    binary.  But the "eclipses" are broad and shallow affairs, not at all like
    CVs near quiescence.  I'd guess that each year (in this early post-nova
    evolution) will bring a different waveform.  Near the celestial equator,
    the star is well placed for essentially all CBAers. (19 23 05.4 +04 57 20
    - 2000.0, chart on CBA website)
    
    The other nearly equatorial target for campaign start-up is V1432 Aql
    (right next to V1494 on the CBA chart page).  This star is famous in CV
    history.  It was mistaken for a Seyfert galaxy for more than 10 years,
    until an accurate X-ray position showed that it ain't the same.  In the
    meantime, there was a flurry of papers purporting to explain how a
    Seyfert galaxy could have a strict 3.3 hour period!
    
    Anyway, it's a great target.  Though no barn-burner at V=14.8, it has a 1
    mag variation and a deep eclipse... lots of nice signal to keep one
    entertained.  I recommend it as co-equal with V1494 Aql.  You might want
    to choose one and stay with it - that's usually the way to attain maximum
    sensitivity in our period searches.
    
    Finally, there's V1223 Sgr.  This one *is* a barn-burner at 13.3.  For one
    reason or another, we've never gotten a really good campaign on it.  It's
    a DQ Her star with a 13 minute period, and also an orbital period near 5
    hours.  Let's nail it this time around.
    
    A couple of weeks ago I sent off our paper on V442 Oph and RX1643+34, and
    also tucked in the superhump results on V795 Her and DW UMa.  There was a
    long author list  (Patterson, Fenton, Thorstensen, Harvey, Skillman,
    Fried, Monard, O'Donoghue, Beshore, Martin, Niarchos, Vanmunster, Foote,
    Bolt, Rea, Cook, Butterworth).  I'll send out copies to all authors today.
    If you don't get it in a week, and are not overseas, feel free to
    complain!  (Also, check the website; it may pop up there in a few days.)
    
       joe
    
    Received on 19 Jul 2002