CBA Center for Backyard Astrophysics



News

recent · all
2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003
2002 · 2001 · 2000 · 1999 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996

    Call off the dogs

    From: Joe Patterson <jop_at_astro.columbia.edu>
    Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 10:42:46 -0500 (EST)
    Dear CBAers,
    
    Well, as you saw from Tonny's message, mister SDSS1730 slunk back to
    quiescence, and WZ Sge is getting harder to observe, due to its own fading
    and the hostility of the western horizon.  So it's time, finally, to call
    off the dogs for both stars.  In a month's time we'll have another shot at
    WZ with a big telescope, and we'll see if we can track the eclipse
    waveform at that time... but after observing it for 94 out of 95 nights,
    we should have learned the pattern by now!  (And we did.)
    
    Whew, what a run, I hope we can rest for 25 more years.  Ha.
    
    Meanwhile, there are other fish in the ocean.  Dave Skillman and Jerry
    Foote are mounting a big campaign on TT Ari, which is pulsing away with a
    big apsidal superhump.  This is an ideal target this time of year,
    especially for small scopes since at V=10.8 there are lots of photons
    available.  I hope that we can get some coverage from AU-NZ too... I know
    you're not thrilled with the dec, but we still have no northern coverage
    from CA to the Crimea, so we certainly do crave contributions from
    Australasia and Oceania!
    
    In principle,  TT Ari should be the star that will teach us all the
    intricate details of apsidal superhumps, since it is so bright and roughly
    equatorial.  So far, it appears to just flash a very powerful but
    structureless superhump... but from past experience it seems a good bet
    that the lack of structure merely reflects a lack of diligence in the
    campaign.  November 2001 is the month to find out.
    
    We have also received data on V592 Cas, mainly from Ed Beshore.  Kind of
    a mystery, this one.  Two nights showed strong humps, and the other four
    not.  This is sometimes means two closely spaced signals are beating
    together, slowly travelling in and out of phase.  That interpretation
    seems not to work for the present data... I just can't figger it out based
    on the present data.  So we should either get a lot more, or give up!
    Since it's a bright star and has a great dec for the Europeans, I'm
    inclined to say let's hang in there for a few more weeks - and I hope the
    Euros can bail us out!
    
    Finally among northern targets is FS Aur.  This will be a major December
    target, but it's important to get an early start, as the *precise* value
    of the period is the key datum (to allow phasing with previous years) and
    that is best served with the longest possible baseline of observation.
    Another happily northern and decently bright (14) target.  It's a great
    season for northern CBAers!  As usual, the best strategy is to settle on
    one of these stars and fire away relentlessly on it.
    
    Now for the south.  Thanks to Chen's recent article in MNRAS, identifying
    numerous results from the Edinburgh-Cape survey for blue stars, we now
    have a lot of fresh meat for hungry southern photometrists.  Among the
    seasonal targets, the ones that seemed really promising to me are
    
    EC23128-3105  23 12 50.0   -31 05 09  V=16.6 (sorry) but P estimated as
                                          1.4 hr
    EC23593-6724  23 59 21.7   -67 24 28  V=14.3 (oooo) and P~2.0 hr
    EC05114-7955  05 11 25.1   -79 55 02  V=15.1 and P~3.1 hrs
    
    Coords  are 1950.0 by the way.  I think Jonathan has charts for all on the
    CBA website.  All these stars looks astrophysically pretty interesting to
    me.
    
    The other southern target is BW Scl.  We had a wonderful harvest from
    Chile 2 weeks ago, supplemented by data from Bob Rea.  There is one strong
    and probably stable period in the system, but we do need a longer baseline
    of data in 2001 to guarantee an accurate cycle count over the season.  So
    we definitely need another 4-6 weeks of coverage.  I apologize for the
    faintness, and the ugliness of the light curve (just not a helluva lot
    that grabs your eyeball... but oh, does that fourier transform love it!).
    If you don't mind ugly depressing light curves, observe this star! -
    otherwise you'll be a lot happier with the above list of 3.
    
    Have a great ol' time observing... the ducks are on the proverbial pond.
    
    
          joe
    
    Received on 31 Oct 2001