CBA Center for Backyard Astrophysics



News

recent · all
2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003
2002 · 2001 · 2000 · 1999 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996

    UU Aqr and Z And, New Heroes

    From: Joe Patterson <jop_at_astro.columbia.edu>
    Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 08:27:41 -0400 (EDT)
                                                                 9/14/2000
    
    Dear CBAers,
    
         Reports on the company campaigns first...
    
         DV UMa and IY UMa both coming out in Dec 2000 PASP.  Final copies
    up on the web within a week, replacing the first versions (no big
    changes though).  Copies in the mail to collaborators today.
    
         V751 Cyg submitted to PASP a few weeks ago, waiting for referee.
    Beautiful standard-issue negative superhump.  Some possibly interesting
    results on flickering.  Up on the web shortly.
    
         UU Aqr is a roaring success.  The 1998 campaign gave a surprising
    result, with superhumps at a period apparently 16% longer than Porb.
    That was a record (the old record was 10%).  But the signal was
    somewhat weak, drifted in frequency, and possibly subject to aliasing
    (the campaign was almost entirely from NZ, with Marc Bos, Stan Walker,
    and Bill Allen).  Ergo, we needed more data.  All the more so because
    this was a (candidate) *positive* superhump in a long-period eclipsing
    system, and eclipses often enable us to learn the mass ratio from
    independent evidence.  For years I've been trying to establish an
    empirical correlation between epsilon (the fractional period excess of
    Psh over Porb) and the mass ratio.  I think I've got it for small
    epsilon, but my calibrators run out at Porb=2.06 hrs - so great is my
    zeal to obtain a point at Porb=3.9 hrs!
    
         The response to the 2000 call for UU Aqr data was fast.  Bob
    Fried, Lasse Jensen, and Lew Cook sprang to action, no surprise there.
    So did Fred Velthius, Jenny McCormick, and Robert Rea (CBA-Pakuranga
    and CBA-Nelson); these Kiwis are less well known to our group, but have
    been stunning me all year with the quality and quantity of their data.
    So did Neil Butterworth, finding breaks in a long cloudy spell in
    Australia.  And Jerry Solomon, a first-time CBAer who works at the
    "Center for Computational Biology" at Caltech -- I dunno what that is
    but it sure sounds interesting (I hope he will tell us in a Fall
    newsletter -- yea, verily, it will happen).
    
         When I spliced the first 9 days together and removed eclipses, an
    obvious positive superhump appeared with eps = 7%.  This vaults UU Aqr
    into top priority for the next 30-40 days.  We need that time to
    increase frequency resolution and look for other stuff (higher
    harmonics, frequency drift, possible orbital and negative-superhump
    signals).  At 13th mag and near the celestial equator, this star should
    receive a lot of attention from us.
    
         I still dunno what to think of the 1998 result with eps = 16%.
    It may be interesting that this signal is displaced in frequency from
    nu-orb by exactly (within errors) twice the displacement in 2000.  On
    the other hand, it may just signify that I spend too much time punching
    calculator buttons.
    
        Oh yeah, the AO Oct campaign is also (I think) over.  Data from
    Marc, Fred, and Jenny defined Psh pretty well, and our South African
    friends (Brian Warner, Claire Blackman, Patrick Woudt) got both
    quiescent and superoutburst photometry.  Should lead to an epsilon for
    this interesting star.
    
        Other campaigns in progress.  We need pulse timings (2-3 hr
    observations, very careful absolute timing please) of the DQ Her stars
    that are in season now (AO Psc, FO Aqr, V709 Cas, V405 Aur).  And we
    need frequent shots at Cep 1 = GD 552.  No eruptions in history yet for
    this star, but any definition of outburst activity or periodic signal
    would be precious.
    
        Finally there is Z Andromedae.  Jeno Sokoloski obtained a large
    batch of outburst photometry 3 years ago, and found stable 28 minute
    pulses in the B light curve.  It just went up again, to 10th magnitude,
    and will probably stay bright throughout the season.  Since most of you
    observe unfiltered with red-sensitive CCDs, I was somewhat doubtful
    that this weak signal would be detectable.  But Dave Skillman's first
    night gave a reasonably clear detection.  So.... for northern
    smallscopers, Z And is a very good target throughout the fall.  Watch
    for saturation though.  If you happen to have a B filter, that would
    probably give you an advantage (Bob, this would be a good target for
    BVI or some such thing, especially since you can get to 1% in such a
    short time).
    
        That's the lot.  Pretty good September menu.  In a few weeks we'll
    start a strong push for VY Scl, which is now running around 12.8 and
    which is a fine candidate for superhumps.  Any australites inclined to
    get an early start, that would be mighty nice.
    
        By the way, Jonathan visited New York this week and tuned up all
    our CBA machinery.  Things work a lot better now!
    
    
              joe
    
    Received on 14 Sep 2000